|
 |
Profiles
International
Step One
Pre Employment Screening
|
AS UNEMPLOYMENT DROPS, EMPLOYEE THEFT ON
RISE
By Noelle KNOX
The New York Times
Kelly Green and Karri Carter spent a night late last month in McLean County Jail
in Bloomington, Ill. Both were salesclerks from the nearby Wal-Mart, arrested in
the store and charged with ringing up sales to phantom customers, recording
bogus returns and then pocketing cash refunds of more than $300.
Green, 31, and Carter, 27, who are
scheduled to he arraigned this week, declined to discuss the case; Bryan
Holmberg, a spokesman for Wal-Mart Stores would say only that "this kind of
incident is very rare." But if they are convicted, the women will become another
statistic in a rising tide of employee theft in retail stores.
One of the few disadvantages of a
robust economy, human resource administrators say, is its effect on hiring
practices, especially among retailers. The nation's unemployment rate has held
at well below 5 percent this year.
The shrinking labor pool,
consultants say, gives employers fewer hiring choices, exacerbating other
changes in employment patterns that have contributed to worker theft in recent
years.
"The employment base is low, and
retailers are not getting a lot of people who are extremely qualified," said
David Johnston, director of training and research for LP Innovations, the
loss-prevention subsidiary of J. Baker Inc., a Canton, Mass., retailer that owns
the Casual Male Big and Tall clothing chain. "If the company doesn't have an
effective screening program, they're going to get whoever comes in off the
street."
Retailers reported a surge in employee theft last year, according to the latest
National Retail Security Survey by the University of Florida. The companies in
the survey attributed 47 percent of all lost cash and merchandise to the light
fingers of their workers, up from 41 percent in 1996.
If the survey results are accurate
for the industry as a whole, workers stole $13.3 billion of the $28.1 billion in
cash and merchandise that retailers lost last year. By comparison, shoplifting
-which gets far more publicity as a source of retail crime - accounted for only
$9.6 billion, or 34 percent. The remainder was lost to vendor fraud and
administrative error.
To deal with theft problems, more
retailers are running employee
background checks through organizations like;
the United States Mutual Association, a clearinghouse on theft and fraud cases.
Robert Ralicki, vice president of
marketing for United States Mutual which counts Sears, Roebuck and Gap Inc.
among its subscribing companies~ said it had 2.5 million cases of employee theft
in its database. That number, be said, should double within two years as more
retailers contribute information.
"Retailers have limited resources
they can devote to
background checks for entry-level personnel," he said, "but
they' want to know if John or Jane Doe has a track record of dishonesty before
they give them access to their cash and merchandise". According to the
University
of Florida study, an employee who steals will take an average of $1,058 in cash
or merchandise in a year, while a shoplifter will walk away with an average of
$212.
High turnover, another abettor to theft, also dogs the industry, because an
entry-level retail job no longer is seen as a first step on a career path. And
working conditions at retail jobs also can lead to a discontented work force.
Steve Kasserman, a loss-prevention officer at the Bi-Mart Corp., a discount
chain based in Eugene, Ore., has his own explanation for this kind of thinking.
"If you pay someone $6.50 an hour to stand on their feet," he said, and to take
whatever insults the public dishes out for seven to nine hours a day, "they get
mad, and eventually they'll take it out by stealing."
Waco Tribune Herald
Sunday September 13, 1998
Click Here
to request more information or Call 1-800-211-6995
Some of our other
assessment tools include the:
Career
|
Step One
|
Sales
|
Performance
|
360
|
Team
|
Customer Service
Third party services
|